If someone asked you who you’re following in today’s church landscape, you could probably answer with a list of 3-5 church leaders and perhaps 3-5 organizations to whom you’re paying close attention.
Even if you say you don’t have a list, chances are you do.
Your list might simply consist of critics of mega-church leaders or mega-churches.
We all follow someone. Especially in our hyper-connected era.
I am actually exceptionally grateful for what God is doing in many mega-churches and have deep respect for many mega-church leaders. Critics who say “all mega-churches are ______” in my view simply haven’t done their research.
I’m also a massive advocate of adopting best practices from anyone and anywhere (business, church, thought leaders etc).
After all, no one learns in isolation. Very few of us ever come up with an idea ‘no one has ever thought of before.’
And it works. Even in Canada.
So why this post then?
Because there’s a world of difference between adopting best practices and blindly copying.
Here’s the difference.
5 Reasons You Shouldn’t Blindly Copy a Mega-Church
So why wouldn’t you blindly copy a mega-church?
Here are 5 reasons I’ve both experienced personally and observed widely among other church leaders, and 5 ways to better adopt the practices you see and admire.
For context, I have adopted a TON of learning from mega-churches and many sources over the years, both through transitioning a church (leading three tiny mainline churches into one, growing church that grew to 800) and through church planting (founding a church plant that now reaches 1100 each weekend).
But here are the traps you’ll fall into if you blindly copy your favourite leader or organization:
1. You’ll mix up models
Even back in the dial-up days, some of us used to watch other churches.
Then I went to a conference in 1999 and where I met James Emery White. He asked me about the changes I was making our our three little church and I explained that we were taking best practices from Willow and Saddleback and a bunch of other churches and combining them.
I’ll never forget what he told me.
He said “You don’t understand church models. Those are incompatible with each other. They aren’t the same thing. Carey, you need to become a student of models.”
Guess what? He was 100% right.
So I became a student of models.
While churches like North Point, LifeChurch, Elevation and NewSpring look the same on the outside, they approach ministry differently in many areas: groups, kids ministry, how they structure staff, how they reach out in the community and even the programs they offer.
When you study church models, pay attention to the differences.
Otherwise you might be adopting what you think made them effective, but didn’t. You might end up implementing a fake version of whatever you thought was the original, like buying a Pollo shirt rather than a Polo shirt.
You can’t effectively adopt what you don’t understand.
2. You’ll create an incompatible hybrid
When you mix models, as described above, you can easily end up with a hybrid model that just doesn’t work.
Each effective church you’re studying (be it well known or not) is the product of years of development, prayer, trial and error and fine-tuning until it finally all worked together powerfully.
If you strip a part off one model, borrow another from a second church, randomly select something you like from a third and THEN try to combine into something effective at your church, you’re headed for almost certain failure.
Why? Because there’s a good chance the components you borrowed don’t work well together.
Think of it this way: you can’t easily fix your Android phone with iPhone parts, or your iPhone with Android parts. They’re both phones, but they’re not the same.
If you put most Ford truck parts into a Tesla, it won’t run. They’re both vehicles, but they’re not the same.
In the same way, all the churches you study are churches, but they’re not the same.
You want a compatible system.
Naturally, once you see that certain parts will fit into your system beautifully because you understand the ‘part’ and you understand your system, you can adapt them.
3. You won’t own it
This one’s huge.
It’s easy than ever to attend conferences, read books, skim blogs, follow leaders and borrow a bucketful of ideas.
The challenge, though, is two-fold.
First, the ideas you’re borrowing from the leaders in question was a hard-fought idea. They developed it, revised it, changed it again and reworked it until it finally became an idea worth sharing. It was a part of them before they shared it within anyone. They owned it.
Second—and obviously—you haven’t owned that idea at the same level. And until you do, it might not prove nearly as effective for you as it has for them.
All of that leads us to this: leaders who don’t own their ideas are rarely as effective as leaders who do.
Can you own an idea that you didn’t come up with?
Of course you can.
But usually first, you need to
Wrestle with it
Rethink it back to first principles
Then it’s yours.
Often we steal ideas because we think they’ll work, but we don’t know why they work.
And if that happens, when people ask us questions about an idea, we usually can’t answer them well, if at all.
“It worked somewhere else” is not a convincing line of reasoning.
If you can’t answer a deep line of questioning around an idea, you don’t own it.
4. You won’t change your system
When you’re borrowing ideas from other leaders and organizations, the change you ultimately need to make is deep and structural.
Borrowing a promising idea can be like putting new siding on a house whose foundation is crumbling. It looks great, but you really haven’t solved anything.
As Andy Stanley explains in his classic systems talk, your system—more than anything else—drives your outcome.
Often the change you need to make is deep, systemic and permanent.
As I explain in Lasting Impact, a bad governance system or other structural barriers will restrict the growth of your church.
A pastor who insists on doing most of the pastor care personally will permanently stunt the growth of your church (I explain why here).
If you’re not willing to re-invent everything in your church, you’ll never be satisfied with the change.
Any change usually means a systems change.
5. You’ll ignore context
I’m a little hesitant to mention context because about 99% of the time I hear leaders misuse it.
How? Most church leaders use context as an excuse, not as an explanation.
If you want to be completely ineffective as a church leader, please use your context as an excuse.
I could say more about using context as an excuse (I’m super-passionate about the subject), but I’ve written more fully on it here.
Here’s the bottom line: you can make excuses or you can make progress, but you can’t make both.
That said, there are two contexts leaders routinely miss: theirs and yours.
Think of borrowing ideas the same way you’d think about transplanting a tree: if you want the plant to thrive, you need to match the soil and nutrients of the transplant location to the soil and nutrients of the original location.
And not all plants thrive everywhere. Palm trees tend to do less well in Alaska than in Florida.
Study the source context for the idea:
Is the context a business context?
Is the church in the bible belt or a heavily unchurched area?
Is the church rural or urban?
What’s the ethnic makeup of the organization?
Is it a church plant or an established church?
What makes the leader I’m studying different from me?
Take notes and simply compare and contrast their situation to your situation. This will help you understand the why and the what of the idea or best practice.
Then make any adaptations you need to so the practice or idea thrives in your context.
But don’t use the differences as an excuse why something won’t work. Use it to gain understanding on how to make it work.
Poor leaders list a million reasons why something won’t work. Great leaders find the one reason it will.
Be that leader.
Borrow All The Best Practices and Ideas You Can
So what’s the bottom line?
Borrow (even steal) all the best practices and ideas you possibly can. Especially from successful organizations and churches.
And make sure:
You understand the models you’re studying
All the components of your strategy work together seamlessly
You own it
You’re making the deep system changes you need to
You understand context as way of ensuring your new idea thrives
That’s my best advice in this area.
What are you learning?
I’d love to hear from you. Scroll down and leave a comment.