Cheerleader and Critic
Leaders find themselves wrestling with two roles all the time. We are both the biggest cheerleaders and the biggest critics of everything within our organization. It’s a tension that’s necessary and often difficult to manage. It’s Jim Collin’s Stockdale paradox at work in a very practical way.
We need to be the cheerleaders because:
- We really believe in the cause and the cause is worth everything we pour into it (and more).
- We believe in the people around us and value them deeply.
- Everyone needs encouragement – all of us do better when we know we’re moving in the right direction and can see we’re making a difference.
But, we are also its chief critics:
- No one should be more willing to name the brutal facts than we are.
- No one should be thinking more about our shortcomings and areas for improvement than leaders do.
- No one should be more honest about an organization than its leaders.
And here in lies the tension. We need to balance both of these roles carefully, prayerfully and thoughtfully.
Over emphasizing the cheerleader role can lead to:
- Self-deception
- Narcissism
- A detachment from reality
Over-emphasizing the critic role can lead to:
- Discouragement
- Demoralization
- A loss of hope
Sometimes I think as a leader I can tip too hard on one side or another.
In fact, if I don’t constantly correct myself, I will lean toward cheerleading in public forums and criticizing in private forums.
So here’s what I have to do to correct that. I need to remember to be accurate and honest about things where we’re at when communicating publicly (eliminating ‘pastor spin’ as one friend calls it), and be sure we celebrate all the progress we’ve made when working privately with the team. If I can keep those two things straight, I do a much better job managing the tension.
How do you encounter these two conflicting roles in what you do? What bothers you about them? What do you like about them? Which side do you tend to tip toward and what do you do about it?